// Capability Statement — Download PDF
Insights / DoD 8140
Cyber Workforce

DoD 8570 is gone. 8140 and the DCWF, explained.

The baseline-certification era is over. Work roles, three qualification pathways, and deadlines that have already passed — how the new system works for programs and for your career.

For nearly two decades, DoD 8570.01-M defined cyber careers in the defense world: IAT and IAM levels, and a short list of baseline certifications — Security+, CISSP, CASP — that unlocked them. That era is over. The 8140 series (directive, instruction, and the 2023 qualification manual DoDM 8140.03) replaced it with the DoD Cyber Workforce Framework (DCWF) — and the compliance deadlines have now arrived.

What changed

8570 (old)8140 / DCWF (now)
Unit of qualificationPosition categories (IAT I–III, IAM I–III, IASAE)70+ DCWF work roles, each with a code
How you qualifyBaseline certification onlyThree pathways: certification, education, or approved training
DepthOne level per positionProficiency tiers per work role (basic / intermediate / advanced)
Source of truthThe old approved-certs chartQualification matrices on DoD Cyber Exchange (v2.1, Sept 2025)
Staying currentCert CE cyclesContinuous professional development requirements

The deadlines that already passed

February 15, 2025: civilian and military personnel in cybersecurity-element work roles had to be foundationally qualified under DoDM 8140.03. February 15, 2026: the requirement extended to the IT, cyber effects, intelligence, and enabler workforce elements — plus residential (environment-specific) qualification for the cybersecurity element. New hires get their own clocks: nine months to foundational qualification and twelve months to residential, from assignment date.

What it means if you're a contractor

Contracts and task orders increasingly specify DCWF work-role codes instead of "IAT Level II." Your certifications still matter — but whether a given cert qualifies now depends on the work role's matrix entry, not the old chart. Security+ still appears widely at foundational tiers; advanced roles want more. When staffing cleared programs, the question changed from "is this person 8570 compliant?" to "is this person qualified for work role 461 at intermediate?" Check the matrix, not your memory.

What it means if you're building a cleared career

The good news: certifications are no longer the only door. Degrees and approved training now count as qualification pathways, and hands-on experience finally has formal standing. The strategic move is to know your target work-role codes, qualify against them deliberately, and speak that language on your resume — teams staffing to 8140 search by work role. Pair that with a clearance and you're describing exactly what a program can bill you against. More on the clearance side in our clearance ladder guide.

Quick answers

Is Security+ still enough?
Sometimes. Security+ still appears in many foundational-tier qualification matrices, but qualification is now per work role and proficiency level — advanced roles require more. Check the current DoD 8140 qualification matrix for the specific work-role code instead of relying on the old 8570 chart.
Does 8140 apply to contractors?
Yes, in practice. Contract language increasingly requires personnel in covered roles to be qualified under 8140/DCWF, specified by work-role code. Contractors staffing cyber positions on DoD programs should map their people to work roles and matrix requirements now.
What happened to IAT and IAM levels?
They're retired along with 8570.01-M. Positions are now described by DCWF work-role codes with proficiency levels. Old position descriptions written in IAT/IAM terms are being rewritten as contracts and billets are updated.
Put this to work

Need it done, not just explained?

This is the work we do every day. Tell us where your program stands and we'll give you a straight answer.

Talk to Ausper